article 3 - Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word.

 article 3

Walter Ong agrees with what Abram says mostly but he goes deeply in talking about how we live in a sensory world that is described through our personal experiences and spoken words. It's described through how we interpret the world around us through our senses and repeated words. I agree with this. I think about storytelling and how when someone tells me a crazy story I can actually experience through them. By listening to how their voice changes and how strong they get, their personal experience. And by watching their actions and movements to describe the event. But if I were to have just read a text about the same event I really don't think I would experience it in the same way. It wouldn't be as cool, it wouldn't catch my attention as much, i would remember it more if it was told verbally. Because of this, I did like both abram, and ong but the way the book goes in depth about the experience itself of oral words is just different. How much does a story change if it is written instead of orally told and passed down?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kip Redick Introduction

symbols, culture death, bones

Isabella Mann: Cabeza De Vaca